Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Horniblow's avatar

As a keen bush walker, an avid tree planter and a known "tree hugger" I must say that I was drawn into "To Speak for the Trees" ( and by no means wanting to stray from the thread of strong women, trees and modern lesbians). I love Richard Power's prize winning book " The Overstory " and was delighted to discover that Diana Beresford-Kroeger is the inspiration behind one the book's characters, woven into a narrative structure based around the life cycle of trees. I am an adamant believer in the need for modern society to reconnect to the natural world as a fundamental foundation to correcting a planet in crisis and working to preserve biodiversity of the planet's living organisms; animal, plant and microbial. The heartening learning from Diana is the need for all us to be custodians of the ancient lore of the Sacred Forest, part of the tree of life living in awe of the beauty and splendor of the natural world that surrounds us, and that the human presence in nature should be as an interconnected species not a divorced from it. On the tangent of trees I recently read Elif Shafak's wonderful novel "The Island of Missing Trees" ( highly recommended; Woman's Prize for Fiction 2022 ). Beside being deeply moved by the Romeo and Juliette themed story of love and grief set in the tumultuous modern history of Cyprus, (as you rightfully stated in your preamble human nature stays the same) , one of the most striking and sometimes polarising elements of the book is the inclusion of a fig tree as a character and voice in story, who imparts a view of the characters' past, the natural world, and the history of Cyprus. A stoic , wise and resilient narrator ; a witness to a difficult history. At first I found the voice of the tree odd but grew to love it's permanence, it's conscious connection to a history as a silent witness.

As I write this I recall dinners with my, at the time, teenage children who very rightfully expressed their exasperation of living in and inheriting the stewardship of a planet under the stresses of human induced climate change. They were challenging, heartfelt and confronting conversations. A few difficult questions that were asked of us that stick in my mind were "how could your generation let this happen ? And what did you do to or why didn't you stop it from happening? ". How let down they felt from the governance of our and previous generations was starkly evident. In my childhood I was never confronted by concept of irrevocable climate change , perhaps it was more the ravages of war and nuclear proliferation, but I was brought up to appreciate and more importantly respect the natural environment. My wife and I were candid about what we had done to consciously change our habits, carbon footprints and impacts, the environmental causes we had supported, how we had been characterised as "greenies" for expressing and showing our concerns over time, as if that was an insulting put down by more conservative thinkers. (I am proudly a so called greenie). All micro actions in the bigger, more complicated, global context of countering environmental damage. The one adage I did implore was to think of the Butterfly Effect and the necessity to Think Globally by Acting Locally; all micro actions count.

I am looking forward to doing a lot more interesting tree planting in the near future. I have always dreamt of creating my own botanical garden and building on the existing wildlife corridors for transiting koalas on the piece of reclaimed dairy farm we plan to call home. Thank you again for the bright side thought provocation.

Expand full comment

No posts